3 ms·
When warnings are taken seriously, and no disaster happens: Clearly, the warnings were unnecessary. When warnings are not given and a disaster happens: clearly
by jaggederest 3y ago
When warnings are taken seriously, and no disaster happens: Clearly, the warnings were unnecessary.
When warnings are not given and a disaster happens: clearly the team was incompetent and should have seen it coming.
When warnings are not given or ignored and no disaster happens: they were overblown and pointless, why do we even have a disaster recovery team.
When warnings are taken seriously and a disaster still happens: it's the worst of both worlds.
You can't win in this situation. No combination of warning/not warning and disaster/no disaster results in success. If you can't trust your managers to cogently weigh the risks and costs, there's nothing you can do.
- rgmerk 3y agoMy point is that engineers sometimes view anything that goes wrong with their tiny corner of the system as a disaster, which is not always the case. My (engineering) boss is more risk-tolerant than I am, but after 30 years in the business I respect his judgement that a particular risk is worth running.