3 ms·
I don't know if you're trying to be sarcastic or what, but it's as worth enshrining as the "freedom of speech". You could easily say "lol what, yOu'RE NoT aLLoW
by gretch 3y ago
I don't know if you're trying to be sarcastic or what, but it's as worth enshrining as the "freedom of speech". You could easily say "lol what, yOu'RE NoT aLLoWed to Talk?", but what it actually means is that the government can't persecute you based on what you say.
You should note that many authorities and governments in the past have absolutely punished the gathering of scientific knowledge, e.g. in a theology.
- jrflowers 3y ago> You could easily say "lol what, yOu'RE NoT aLLoWed to Talk?", but what it actually means is that the government can't persecute you based on what you say. This is a good point. A person can mention freedom of speech and another person can respond in intentional misunderstanding in order to make a joke or to seem intelligent. Like for example, someone can see an article written by the creator of Sci-Hub on a very specific topic and bring up rocks.
- gretch 3y agoYes well unfortunately that author decided to over generalize their own argument into “Access to knowledge is a human right.” That indeed is the “specific topic” isn’t it?