Come on Stanford Daily, you can do and have done better than this. > Bankman-Fried’s breach of bail conditions may cause his [bail guarantors] to forfeit the c

Come on Stanford Daily, you can do and have done better than this. > Bankman-Fried’s breach of bail conditions may cause his [bail guarantors] to forfeit the collateral they put forward That's not how it works. The bail is to ensure you show up -- and SBF showed up and was tossed in jail to await trial. The bond is terminated; he won't get out unless the court agrees on another one (very unlikely) or he is found not guilty of all charges (ditto). > New court filings allege that Bankman and Fried were themselves improperly enriched, and exclusive Daily reporting shows that Bankman continues to serve in official capacities at the school. It's hardly exclusive as these points (e.g. the houses) had been printed in the newspapers at the time of their sons' arrest. And as tenured faculty there is no reason beyond shame that they should not continue to work. Probably they need the income. If only Stanford had a law school where the author of this piece could go ask about this before writing...