It’s only common sense to present the pros and cons of policy. You don’t seem to even think it’s worth your time to take an actual stab at estimating the cost o

It’s only common sense to present the pros and cons of policy. You don’t seem to even think it’s worth your time to take an actual stab at estimating the cost of death, and so it’s only common sense to think you haven’t thought your way through this at all. You’re still arguing this is a budgetary concern without acknowledging the fact that your policy may actually result in a worse budgetary concern. You know what’s also common sense? That death isn’t a good thing. More death = worse society. Bad society = no money.