4 ms·
If anything it's less productive because people have to parse all that nonsense. I was gobsmacked to hear a friend say that their work guidance is to use ChatG
by simmerup 3y ago
If anything it's less productive because people have to parse all that nonsense.
I was gobsmacked to hear a friend say that their work guidance is to use ChatGPT to write letters to external clients for example. I know for sure I'd be insulted if someone sent me paragraphs of text to read created from a sentence long prompt. I'd rather have the prompt, my time is valuable as well.
- mritchie712 3y agoahhhh, but they're pasting the 3 page email into ChatGPT ("summarize this"). The future is here.
- ilyt 3y agoWouldn't be surprised if that was next Outlook feature. Cue someone making some horrible error because some crucial information didn't survive ChatGPT->ChatGPT round-trip
- mritchie712 3y agoit's already here... https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/03/16/introducing-microsoft-365-copilot-your-copilot-for-work/ https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/03/16/introducing-micr...
- ddmma 3y agoActually this was in an Azure hacktoon some time ago https://devpost.com/software/amabot https://devpost.com/software/amabot
- kossTKR 3y agoYeah that's one of the insane things that will happen. Very soon everyone will in effect "hide" behind an agent that will take all kinds of decisions on one's behalf. Everything from writing e-mails to proposals but also to sue someone, make financial decisions, and be a filter that transforms everything going in or out. I can't imagine this world really. How the hell are people going to compete or stand out? Doesn't it seem that what little meritocracy existed wills soon drown in noise?
- simmerup 3y agoI was scared about organizations doing this and losing their connection to the humans they serve. The realization that individuals will also have this barrier to the world is even scarier. If it goes that way we could be looking at a change to society on the level of social media, again. Mad.
- voiper1 3y agoI write emails and put it into chatgpt and ask it to make it more concise or point out issues. No utility in asking chatgpt to needlessly expand the text...
- kenjackson 3y agoI think the more common case is to have a handful of bullet points and some notes and ask chat GOT to put into a coherent letter for an external customer with the goal of XYZ. I’ve done similar things and it is a huge timesaver. I still have to edit it, but it gives me a start that’s probably on par to what a Junior engineer would write as a first draft.
- klabb3 3y agoExactly right. If you increase entropy you need energy to reduce it back. It be more valuable to take crap that humans have put together incoherently and summarizing it. (Perhaps someone should put a GPT on the other end in order to read it) I honestly don’t know why we’re so obsessed with having LLMs generate crap. Especially when they’re very capable of reducing, simplifying. Imagine penetrating legal texts, political bills, obtuse technical writing, academic papers and making sense of those quickly. Much more useful imo.
- throw__away7391 3y agoYou'll just have people reversing it into a summary on the other end, kind of like a "text" chat where both sides are using text-to-speech and speech-to-text instead of having a phone call.
- skepticATX 3y agoThe amount of othewise very smart people who completely lose the ability to think critically when it comes to "AI" is really interesting to me. I'm not anti-AI; I've recommended that we use it at work a few times where it made sense and was backed by evidence/bencharmks. But for essentially any problem that comes up someone will try to solve it with ChatGPT, even if it demonstrably can't do the job. And these are not business folks, these are engineering leaders who absolutely have the capability to understand this technology.