> Also, Google support in theory means that there's (relatively) little risk of abandonment. I don't know, Google's known for abandoning things left and right.

> Also, Google support in theory means that there's (relatively) little risk of abandonment. I don't know, Google's known for abandoning things left and right. They bought Fastlane and proceeded to abandon it. > You're asking a dev why they like flutter, not a businessman. It's more of a comment on the original post where OP is looking for a job as a Flutter dev - why would anyone choose Flutter to base their product on, if they can't find devs and all the other reasons I mentioned. As a dev - I really like Flutter - no doubt there, but it just doesn't make a lot of business sense due to a chicken and egg problem and likely won't for a while. > native doesn't guarantee the best UX. Even RN's maintainers break their own established rules on their websites. I meant native as in Swift and Kotlin - even splitting it in those two avenues makes you think more about the respective platforms and their expected quirks. I've yet to see a RN and Flutter app with a live activity, for example. All the sports apps out there that are crossplatform don't have a widget, etc