> Just imagine if AI could have the capability of being creative And a world will be imagined in which more resources to problem solving will be provided, whil

> Just imagine if AI could have the capability of being creative And a world will be imagined in which more resources to problem solving will be provided, while at the same time direct interhuman creativity is still preserved as a full untouched possibility. > worse The computation bringing to that result being? And is the aggregate relevant in this case? You are mentally living in your own "naturalistic" perspective and assumptions, which remain largely personal. Political. Subjective. Similarly, your own visualizations seem to be selective: who is that 'our' in your vision of «replacing our human connections with AI»? An aggregate? It suggests a literary vision (like in Science Fiction), not an analysis. You seem to state that «technology» made «the world ... incomprehensible». Now technology enabled informational availability, which is an enabler. Comprehension is not hindered by technology at the individual level - which is that which counts operationally. You seem to be a pessimist as you look at the impact over aggregates, but you forget the root in the ignorance in the detrimental elements in said aggregates.