3 ms·
Yes, and it was under 10,000 points in your previous submission.[1] It was a "disaster" when it was at 8582 when someone else posted 42 days ago.[2] Also, it wa
by tsetse-fly 18y ago
Yes, and it was under 10,000 points in your previous submission.[1] It was a "disaster" when it was at 8582 when someone else posted 42 days ago.[2] Also, it was down "400 points in 10 minutes" 52 days ago.[3]
I don't need you to be my stock ticker.
[1] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=325009 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=325009
[2] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=328204 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=328204
[3] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=318627 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=318627
- helveticaman 18y agoI think it's relevant. It's a landmark in that it is at a 52-week low, and dropped significantly below the psychological 8,000 boundary. I personally find it interesting, and I think some, though perhaps not all, hackers would agree. Plus, I think a lot of people who don't track the market would occasionally want to know when something unusual (like a 5.5% drop) happens in the US economy. There are people who already knew, but that's true for most submissions.