3 ms·
He shouldn't have acquired it in the first place, and appropriately allocated ownership to those doing the work in the first place The act of accumulating it i
by AndrewKemendo 3y ago
He shouldn't have acquired it in the first place, and appropriately allocated ownership to those doing the work in the first place
The act of accumulating it in the first place is unethical
If you then, on your own WHIM and directed however you and you alone want to, give your money away it's no different than starting yet another "going concern" of people who are now employed to give your money based on how YOU want to spend it
This is a bad and socially destructive pattern