2 ms·
The first reason is I’m actually satisfied with vim’s part of what neovim is, so there’s no reason. But I tried neovim recently. It had worse support for windo
by wruza 3y ago
The first reason is I’m actually satisfied with vim’s part of what neovim is, so there’s no reason.
But I tried neovim recently. It had worse support for windows (qt-nvim, iirc). It couldn’t rerender or re-column-count itself on resize and also had few other cosmetic issues that I’ve noted but forgot already. One stupidest thing was you can’t explorer-associate it easily in windows because of how parameters get passed between qt-nvim and a host editor process. I regedit’ed it to a working state after a while, but man.
Otherwise I’d try to side-grade to it, but these issues are complete blockers and it’s a little concerning that they weren’t addressed for so many releases.
Maybe something got fixed since, but I only care enough to check once a year or two.