I think we should I just don't think we can. First off not all technology is completely beneficial for mankind even if it's inherently not evil. The atomic bom

I think we should I just don't think we can. First off not all technology is completely beneficial for mankind even if it's inherently not evil. The atomic bomb for example. It's still not clear how beneficial this technology is. Second, AI is a big unknown. It could lead to a catastrophic future it could not. We don't know. There is merit in keeping things in the status quo as it's not too bad right now. There is also merit in developing the AI to assist humanity. We don't know enough to know which direction is valid. Either way, it's unlikely AI will ever be outlawed. The logical definitions surrounding the concept of AI collide with our notions of morality and ethics in such a confounding way that it's hard to codify into law. If I ban, ai and AI works is that banning freedom of speech? Technically yes, but at the same time there is certainly merit in banning deep fakes. We may be able to figure it out and work out the moral conflicts, but both the law and our analysis of the issue is moving much much slower then the pace of the technology itself. In the end humanity will have no choice but to see the technology roll out in it's full maximal glory. If a banning occurs I believe it will be well after this point.