3 ms·
Not yet. But let's say something in the future were to replace you. LLMs look like a stepping stone. Version 0.001 of the thing that could replace you in the f
by corethree 3y ago
Not yet. But let's say something in the future were to replace you.
LLMs look like a stepping stone. Version 0.001 of the thing that could replace you in the far future. If this ends up being true then the hype seems somewhat valid.
- slashdev 3y agoYou mean general AI? That might replace all of humanity. I’m not concerned about my job. General AI does worry me.
- corethree 3y agoNo something that codes better than you will likely happen long before agi. Also who said agi will replace humanity? That's speculative. More likely it will replace your job first.
- slashdev 3y ago> No something that codes better than you will likely happen long before agi. I don’t think so. I think you need agi to beat a human at such open ended creative work as software engineering. AGI is a singularity. One can’t see beyond it. Whether there is a place for humans or not after that is beyond either of our ability to say.
- corethree 3y agoLLMs already beat and match humans in creating art and deep fakes. It's not that far fetched to see an AI therefore beat humans in other creative endeavors. It's not a singularity. If you build an AGI identical to a human then predicting the outcome of agi is similar to predicting the outcome of human behavior. This is not division by zero. Mind you human behavior is unpredictable, but we never describe the outcomes of human behavior as a "singularity". Agi is the same way... It's unpredictable like human behavior but far far away from a "singularity"