3 ms·
You're lying. Canada acted on a US-warrant ( not an arbitrary law) and her "jail" ( the CFO of Huawei) was in a luxury mansion. The 2 Michaels China retaliated
by NicoJuicy 3y ago
You're lying. Canada acted on a US-warrant ( not an arbitrary law) and her "jail" ( the CFO of Huawei) was in a luxury mansion.
The 2 Michaels China retaliated against, weren't as comfy as her.
Those businessmen are less and less inclined to travel to China.
Here's a lawyer with expertise on the topic, it's a lot more troubling than your "2 Michaels", lol.
Exit bans in China:
https://harrisbricken.com/chinalawblog/china-exit-bans-you-can-check-out-any-time-you-want-but-you-cant-ever-leave/ https://harrisbricken.com/chinalawblog/china-exit-bans-you-c...
- meiraleal 3y ago> You're lying. Canada acted on a US-warrant ( not an arbitrary law) and her "jail" ( the CFO of Huawei) was in a luxury mansion. This is criminal, arbitrary and clearly political.
- NicoJuicy 3y agoRead and learn There was an arrest by the US outstanding, Canada was required by the extradition threaty to at least act, supreme Court found it lawful. There was already a warrant for her arrest for over 4 months in the US ... Ming acknowledged her false statements about Iran to enable her to trade with US. Her "prison" was her 5 million $ home... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extradition_case_of_Meng_Wanzhou https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extradition_case_of_Meng_Wan... The politics was played by China, after the deal that she could go back to China, China randomly locked up 2 Canadians.
- meiraleal 3y agoA typical case of "our doing is under the law" but their doing is arbitrary.