18 ms·

By "grounds for flagging" do you mean comments being reported and removed by moderation or do you mean being heavily downvoted? If the latter, then, again, a l

By "grounds for flagging" do you mean comments being reported and removed by moderation or do you mean being heavily downvoted? If the latter, then, again, a lot of people disagreeing with you isn't generally good evidence of being correct. You might be correct, but the downvotes aren't the thing that proves it. Personally, I'd have a think about why. If it's the former, from what I've seen here comments get removed for tone or being off-topic, not for disagreement.

Dalewyn 3y ago
It's the former[1][2]. I don't count mere downvotes as "flagging", not the least because I want to think words still have meaning. [1]: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/747297210613498216/1140157364633346089/image.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/747297210613498216/11... [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37106062 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37106062
- jpmoral 3y ago
  Okay, I was just clarifying. Tone is really hard to convey and interpret but that read like you were jumping on me for clarifying. I think that's what the problem is. The post in the screenshot is unnecessarily combative. It's not conducive to good discussion. It doesn't have anything to do with beliefs, it's just picking a fight. Change 'right' to 'left' or whatever group and it would've been flagged just the same.
  - knewter 3y ago
    The screenshot is a single question. How is asking a question combative? (I ask that non-combatively, in the weakest possible reading of the words)
    - jpmoral 3y ago
      I've only ever encountered "Do you have a problem with that/x?" as a challenge. Can it be used otherwise? Probably, but a native speaker would know how it's going to be received especially in a contentious topic like politics.
      - knewter 3y ago
        How do you propose that I find out if someone has a problem with x?
        jpmoral 3y ago
        I think in the context of HN, that's not what you want to find out. If I thought the other person just wanted a fight, I'd ignore them. If I thought a good discussion might be had I'd go something like "I think X and Y is good evidence of A. Why do you think that isn't the case?"
  - inquirerGeneral 3y ago
    [dead]

Dalewyn 3y ago

It's the former[1][2]. I don't count mere downvotes as "flagging", not the least because I want to think words still have meaning. [1]: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/747297210613498216/1140157364633346089/image.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/747297210613498216/11... [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37106062 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37106062

jpmoral 3y ago
Okay, I was just clarifying. Tone is really hard to convey and interpret but that read like you were jumping on me for clarifying. I think that's what the problem is. The post in the screenshot is unnecessarily combative. It's not conducive to good discussion. It doesn't have anything to do with beliefs, it's just picking a fight. Change 'right' to 'left' or whatever group and it would've been flagged just the same.
- knewter 3y ago
  The screenshot is a single question. How is asking a question combative? (I ask that non-combatively, in the weakest possible reading of the words)
  - jpmoral 3y ago
    I've only ever encountered "Do you have a problem with that/x?" as a challenge. Can it be used otherwise? Probably, but a native speaker would know how it's going to be received especially in a contentious topic like politics.
    - knewter 3y ago
      How do you propose that I find out if someone has a problem with x?
      - jpmoral 3y ago
        I think in the context of HN, that's not what you want to find out. If I thought the other person just wanted a fight, I'd ignore them. If I thought a good discussion might be had I'd go something like "I think X and Y is good evidence of A. Why do you think that isn't the case?"
- inquirerGeneral 3y ago
  [dead]