> Today Exactly. If we established all law based only on what we currently observe, without considering future implications, then we would fundamentally only b

> Today Exactly. If we established all law based only on what we currently observe, without considering future implications, then we would fundamentally only be a reactive legislative system and not proactive. > Calling this a human rights issue is like calling your ability to order a sandwich for lunch a human rights issue No, that is a gross misrepresentation. The simple fact is that if you don't require the right for a user to modify their general computing hardware, that right will never be awarded systematically, and will in fact be repressed. It's the definition of a slippery slope, because anything can be justified from that point.