3 ms·
The nuclear payload could be treated similar to humans, with eject systems and soft landing built in. The fuel will only be needed for a lighter craft in deep
by gibolt 3y ago
The nuclear payload could be treated similar to humans, with eject systems and soft landing built in.
The fuel will only be needed for a lighter craft in deep space. Getting it up with a high reliability rocket (like Falcon 9) significantly decreases risk.
- ben_w 3y ago> The nuclear payload could be treated similar to humans, with eject systems and soft landing built in. In principle yes — even just on the grounds that enriched fuel is expensive — but it's a hard thing to prove in advance, hence all the times humans died in a space mission one way or another.
- gibolt 3y agoThere have only been 5 instances resulting in 19 fatalities. None were when exiting the atmosphere. 2 were the flawed Space Shuttle on return. Only one other was a flight system, on an experimental craft. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_spaceflight-related_accidents_and_incidents#:~:text=%2Fcosmonaut%22).-,During%20spaceflight,the%20entire%20crew%20was%20killed https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_spaceflight-related_.... Today's rockets are far more reliable, and anything holding nuclear fuel should be the best of the best.
- WalterBright 3y ago> None were when exiting the atmosphere Er, Challenger?