"to which the materials relate" still is a problem if you seize everything that a newspaper has in response to one bit of reporting that you think might have vi

"to which the materials relate" still is a problem if you seize everything that a newspaper has in response to one bit of reporting that you think might have violated a law. This makes it hard for me to see this as anything other than a retaliatory overreach, especially given the context of the paper's track record of critical reporting on local government and law enforcement. It's also worth noting that the article mentions a lawful source for the information in question (a tip from Newell's husband).