3 ms·
You're still missing the point. It's not China manufacturing iPhone, its Apple and its partners. So your first sentence should not have China as a subject. >
by iancmceachern 3y ago
You're still missing the point.
It's not China manufacturing iPhone, its Apple and its partners.
So your first sentence should not have China as a subject.
>Without further context, we cannot say whether a lower number of robots in the US is an indication of inferiority or superiority to China.
Its not a national defence thing. It's not the US vs China. It's Apple. Apple US, Apple China, same thing, still Apple.
Apple makes a factory, that factory has certain economics based on its inputs (labor, materials) and outputs (iphones). Nowhere does China come into play.
We live in a globalized world, it is run by large rich companies, not governments.
- Archelaos 3y agoI don't see that I am missing the point. My point was that without further context the numbers can be interpreted either way. You were at least trying to providing a context. So I see no contradiction here. (NB: "Chinas" was the subject of the parent's remark.)