5 ms·

Would they allow permanently archiving content which is censored by their own regimes?

• pessimizer 3y ago
  Their own governments.
  • deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  • consumer451 3y ago
    “Government” implies a hint of civil respect. I have none in either case. NK needs no explanation, I hope. Here is the most recent example of why I have no respect for the system in Russia: https://www.businessinsider.in/politics/world/news/kremlin-says-russia-theoretically-doesnt-need-to-hold-elections-next-year-because-putin-will-obviously-win/articleshow/102545398.cms https://www.businessinsider.in/politics/world/news/kremlin-s...
    • hunters_laptop 3y ago
      funny thing business insider aint respectable source too
      • consumer451 3y ago
        What would you list as respectable sources?
• hunters_laptop 3y ago
  tbh Im not sure what do you mean, since 40% of my comments at hacker news are get censored, is HN a chinese or russian org?
  • consumer451 3y ago
    > tbh Im not sure what do you mean Let me break it down: - Archives attempt to backup Wikipedia.org for one thing. - Wikipedia.org is blocked in Russia and China. - Therefore it is logical to assume that they would not allow the hosting of an archive of a blocked site, in their own country. The remainder of your comment is illogical.