3 ms·
While this is true, if you were to calculate the last-mile carbon cost it would be much, much higher. A full container of goods costs about 60 gallons of diese
by K0balt 3y ago
While this is true, if you were to calculate the last-mile carbon cost it would be much, much higher.
A full container of goods costs about 60 gallons of diesel to ship across the world.
That same container costs 60 gallons to move 360 miles from a port.
Delivery vehicles drive approximately 0.8 miles per package delivered, and get around 10-20mpg delivering, so each package costs 1/10 to 1/20 of a gallon of fuel to deliver from the depot to your door. Assuming there are 4000 eventual packages in a container, the last mile delivery for the container is 200-400 gallons.
Obviously this is not the case where the final destination is a large receiver, but even then there are still significant transportation impacts in most cases.
I hate the fact that when I read the part about sulfur dioxide I’m like, well, that’s good at least lol. There’s some evidence that cleaning up ship emissions might be a significant contributor to recent sea temperature acceleration, since the cloud seeding effect from ocean shipping has been drastically reduced.
- eltondegeneres 3y agoDo you have a source for energy use for container ship vs trucking?
- NhanH 3y agohttps://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/transportation.pdf https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/transportation.pdf End of page 129, start of page 130 (page 3 and 4 in pdf file). Truck used twice as much energy consumption as all marine vessels. Dry cargo (there are a bunch of ships shipping oils and LNG too) is generally around 60% of marine vessels.
- K0balt 3y agoIt’s been a while since I did this comparison, but I’m pretty sure a little poking around on Google will get you close.