4 ms·
you can just return channel. range works over channels. Close channel once you're done with iterator. Technically there is side effect of that (iterator done li
by ilyt 3y ago
you can just return channel. range works over channels. Close channel once you're done with iterator. Technically there is side effect of that (iterator done like that would always produce extra value before exiting) but you could probably work around it without much boilerplate
- masklinn 3y agoChannels introduce a ton of overhead (https://syslog.ravelin.com/so-just-how-fast-are-channels-anyway-4c156a407e45?gi=6bf63d1d1bfc https://syslog.ravelin.com/so-just-how-fast-are-channels-any...), plus concurrency issues, and termination concerns (they are essentially a resource leak). It's nice that you can iterate channels, but they're a terrible iteration protocol.