3 ms·
Yes we did. And that worked as intended. The alternative was to wait years and years, helplessly, while people die of covid, while it evolves to be less severe.
by grishka 3y ago
Yes we did. And that worked as intended. The alternative was to wait years and years, helplessly, while people die of covid, while it evolves to be less severe.
But that's the problem with our understanding of biology — we somehow can't just reliably predict how things would work. There's an unhealthy amount of trial and error and not much actual engineering. I mean we don't have to do "trials" when building a house or a CPU. We design these things such that we're 100% certain they'll work, and we can explain why and how.
- finikytou 3y agonot really the issue here. the issue was more like why should we trust companies that went to trial and lost for lying then gave their employees a different vaccine than they recommended us to take. hell even the WHO lead didnt take the "safe" vaccine for months while pushing it to the average person and his excuse was 'I save my dose for africa'. in what kind of demented reality are we accepting that as a logical reason? it sounds like a scam at every angle you read it.
- fasteo 3y ago>>> Yes we did. And that worked as intended. The alternative was to wait years and years, helplessly, while people die of covid, while it evolves to be less severe. I think OP is referring to second-order effects, which seems fair in this context.