> you both are utterly misinterpreting what journalists do yet, journalists almost never link their source material. > * The reason why a journalist can be ba

> you both are utterly misinterpreting what journalists do yet, journalists almost never link their source material. > * The reason why a journalist can be bad at doing this summarization in pieces like this is because they are human.* The source is most likely to be digitized and in front of you. How on earth does one manage to not link it, yet has the time to write multiple paragraphs based on it?