I suspect the comment was trying to say that journalism is opinions about facts. And the facts are less important than the opinions. And this is fine. Good jou

I suspect the comment was trying to say that journalism is opinions about facts. And the facts are less important than the opinions. And this is fine. Good journalism is traditionally about holding power to account. Not seeing so much of that at the moment, except out in the mostly-unread fringes. As for SBF - someone else was downvoted for suggesting this is really about the parents. In my uninformed opinion, from the outside this looks like it may well about a very wealthy very narcissistic family which has persuaded itself it's above the law. SBF appears to have absolutely no concept of moral behaviour or legal consequences - remarkable in itself. But there are wider questions about how his parents may have contributed to his beliefs and actions. However this plays out legally, there's going to be a lot of interest in the psychology.