3 ms·
I am amused the clearly gender-normative behaviour here which could easily be considered sexist. But let's be clear: the thiught that counts here could be othe
by heavenlyblue 3y ago
I am amused the clearly gender-normative behaviour here which could easily be considered sexist.
But let's be clear: the thiught that counts here could be otherwise re-interpreted as "I am buying you this gift card specifically because I know you like this brand and will most surely use it". Of course this argument gets more meek if you are just buying some "generic" gift card in which case you could just give someone cash.
Besides, a lot of gift cards come with some other bonuses (like 20% off, etc) so that could be appropriated too.
The general idea of the post though is correct, except in this case the usual gender-normative behaviour is happening: the woman stops arguing with her boyfriend because he's not willing to listen and it's just not that important to win that argument. She will still buy the gift card, and he'll go to his friends whining about her "irrational" behaviour.
- southernplaces7 3y ago>I am amused the clearly gender-normative behaviour here which could easily be considered sexist. So what's the offensive and sexist gender-normative behavior here? Is it that Jimmy is a man who happens to have a girlfriend named Josephine? You do know that millions of couples around the world exist who are exactly like this and not at all existentially ashamed and politically chagrined by being with each other? So did the post do incorrect-think by making even a minimal reference to a heterosexual couple in an extremely normal, completely common context between them?