2 ms·
We've gone with Postgres and pg_vector which works really well thus far, especially since we know and like the existing Postgres tooling and vector functionalit
by danielbln 3y ago
We've gone with Postgres and pg_vector which works really well thus far, especially since we know and like the existing Postgres tooling and vector functionality there is just a (widely supported) pg_vector extension away. Since it now also supports HNSW indices it should perform well on large amounts of vectorized data as well (though we haven't tested this yet).
From a consultant perspective, Postgres as a requirement is a much easier sell then some new, hot but unknown dedicated vector DB.
- kiwicopple 3y ago> HNSW indices it should perform well on large amounts of vectorized data as well (though we haven't tested this yet) here are a few benchmarks from this week's commit: https://jkatz05.com/post/postgres/pgvector-hnsw-performance/ https://jkatz05.com/post/postgres/pgvector-hnsw-performance/