> Reduce consumption? They want to reduce production locally which will have no effect on consumption globally And you'd probably like to believe that individu

> Reduce consumption? They want to reduce production locally which will have no effect on consumption globally And you'd probably like to believe that individual changes are meaningless. > It’s ironic that the first discipline you choose as an example a] it was not the only example b] I'd be the first one to criticize economics > I think I understand now why you don’t engage with my arguments or provide academic references: you believe the science is settled and you no longer have any skepticism. You think it’s a political problem and not a scientific question "Thank you", but you're wrong. > I seem to bring up points you aren’t aware of (eg sulphate aerosol effects) I am aware of "the point", I just haven't read enough about it (yet). My primary interests lie elsewhere. > learnt enough about the models to understand their limits I'm aware of their limits. That doesn't mean they're not useful. Maybe we'll meet again sometime. Be well. Hope I haven't aggravated you too much ;)