> the implication this is an evolution (not devolution) of open source. "implication" > the experts would simply have said: that's not open source. Presumabl

> the implication this is an evolution (not devolution) of open source. "implication" > the experts would simply have said: that's not open source. Presumably the experts did tell them that it is not an open source license, which is why they chose not to claim that it is. > Permissive is a well established term in software licensing. No, the BSL is not. I think BSL easily fits the bill for the word "permissive". It's just all so much gatekeeping, and it's really tiring.