I haven't read the transcript of this conversation in a long time, but thank you for sharing it. The sophistry of his argument is extreme. Yes, of course ther

I haven't read the transcript of this conversation in a long time, but thank you for sharing it. The sophistry of his argument is extreme. Yes, of course there are always "unknown unknowns"-- but the statement "there is no evidence that Iraq is supplying WMDs to terrorists" is not a statement made in a vacuum, in which all permutations of known/unknown are equally likely.