4 ms·
If you are referring to the vaccine as “experimental gene therapy”, it places you in the crackpot territory for anyone knowledgeable about immune vaccine resear
by conception 3y ago
If you are referring to the vaccine as “experimental gene therapy”, it places you in the crackpot territory for anyone knowledgeable about immune vaccine research. Who knows if the rest of your “mountains of evidence “ exist when you lead with nonsense.
- Izkata 3y agoEr, no, they're right. These were the first ever mRNA vaccines, the technology wasn't even safe to use in 2018 (IIRC there was some sort of breakthrough fix to the lipid nanoparticle in 2019 that dealt with its toxicity). Even the adenovirus-vector vaccines are very new, the first time that technology was ever successfully used as in an Ebola vaccine created in 2015. I think the covid ones were the second time it was successfuly used.
- Timon3 3y ago> Er, no, they're right. Er, no, they are wrong. It's not a gene therapy, and it being the first large-scale application doesn't make it experimental.