2 ms·
Fantastic engagement, this is really worth everyone's while. Now instead of snark, can you please explain what is so offensive about someone mentioning Kuhn?
by passwordoops 3y ago
Fantastic engagement, this is really worth everyone's while.
Now instead of snark, can you please explain what is so offensive about someone mentioning Kuhn?
- AlbertCory 3y ago[flagged]
- Vecr 3y agoWhy do you think mentioning Thomas Kuhn is "ritual" and "cliche" at all? I don't think I've ever heard that name before, and even after searching the text of the article for it I don't understand the issue. You write quite rationally on risk so I know you can explain the context of your statements if you want to, why did you not do so this time?
- AlbertCory 3y agoWhat do you expect me to say? Stanford: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhn/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhn/ calls his book "one of the most cited academic books of all time." https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1008716514576 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1008716514576 Maybe you're not tired of reading his name and don't consider it lazy writing. I do though.