4 ms·
As for extending the rationals by 0⁻¹ and giving up properties, a·0 = 0 can still hold for all a ≠ 0⁻¹. To get an idea of what operations do and don't make sen
by jasomill 3y ago
As for extending the rationals by 0⁻¹ and giving up properties, a·0 = 0 can still hold for all a ≠ 0⁻¹.
To get an idea of what operations do and don't make sense when extending the rationals in the way you propose, define ∞ as our 0⁻¹ and refer to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projectively_extended_real_line#Arithmetic_operations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projectively_extended_real_lin...
substituting ℚ and ℚ̂ for ℝ and ℝ̂.
For a similar construction that maintains ordering properties, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_real_number_line#Arithmetic_operations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_real_number_line#Arit...
Finally, note that the complex number equivalent to your construction is really interesting and useful:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_sphere https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_sphere
https://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~arnold/moebius/ https://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~arnold/moebius/
- JonChesterfield 3y agoThe Riemann sphere has always existed beyond my grasp of mathematics. I remember the maths undergraduates being excited about it. Thank you for the references, it looks like I need to learn more before proceeding with certainty.