> Unless he's supposed to save all his ammo for the actual court case and attack the credibility directly there. Yes, that is how he could attack the credibili

> Unless he's supposed to save all his ammo for the actual court case and attack the credibility directly there. Yes, that is how he could attack the credibility of a witness without ending up in hot water. He would have to introduce it into evidence, and hazard the court rejecting it. If it was accepted, then yeah, they could tell the jury about Ellison feeling like she may not be cut out the run Alameda (for all the good that would do, I suspect not very much). If you try to bypass this process unilaterally, then the court isn't going to give you the benefit of the doubt.