> Then why are they making standards in the first place? For one thing, membership in W3C is loaded with representatives from those browser vendors. Which is a

> Then why are they making standards in the first place? For one thing, membership in W3C is loaded with representatives from those browser vendors. Which is a good thing, since W3C would be absolutely useless if browser vendors weren't there. For another, standards aren't the place for rants about who sucks shit and who doesn't. It would be a fun read, but a bad standard. A standard is for saying what you must do, not for saying who sucks shit.