4 ms·
It is just an example that because Google makes it available and wants it to be used doesn't mean it will be used in any appreciable manner.
by meragrin_ 3y ago
It is just an example that because Google makes it available and wants it to be used doesn't mean it will be used in any appreciable manner.
- crazysim 3y agoThey couldn't really push VP9/Opus without making it available in a non-Google proprietary format. WebM seemed more like a vehicle for that. The amount of popular videos served on YouTube in VP9 and Opus may not exactly be WebM, but the codec support byproduct it pushed probably saved Google/YouTube a huge pile of cash.