3 ms·
I'd just be happy with Safari having a functional IndexedDB - an old web standard. https://gist.github.com/pesterhazy/4de96193af89a6dd5ce682ce2adff49a https://
by AlexErrant 3y ago
I'd just be happy with Safari having a functional IndexedDB - an old web standard.
https://gist.github.com/pesterhazy/4de96193af89a6dd5ce682ce2adff49a https://gist.github.com/pesterhazy/4de96193af89a6dd5ce682ce2...
- tw061023 3y agoHow critical that is, compared to WEI - and more broad problem adopting it entails, namely a single company basically dictating the whole web what it can and cannot do?
- threeseed 3y agoReading through that page it looks like a combination of Safari (a) prioritising privacy and performance and (b) not implementing draft specs. With a whole bunch of bugs that have already been fixed.
- DaiPlusPlus 3y agoIndexedDB's API design is one of the worst I've ever seen (next to the original JS document.cookies "API") Fortunately, Safari does support OPFS ( https://stackoverflow.com/a/71581910/159145 https://stackoverflow.com/a/71581910/159145 ) so provided you don't need all of IndexedDB's features and just need an async blob store for large blobs/files/etc (potentially gigabytes and beyond) then OPFS should work for you.