3 ms·
Are you talking about cutting people's tongues out, or prior restraint? Because you don't know who to restrain if they haven't already said something. As a cons
by pessimizer 3y ago
Are you talking about cutting people's tongues out, or prior restraint? Because you don't know who to restrain if they haven't already said something. As a consequence of things you've said in the past, or things that you have just said and have not yet been distributed, you can have that distribution limited or prevented.
All of them are consequences.
- Zetice 3y agoIf your point is causality exists, okay. If your point is that the 1st amendment is an absolute freedom of speech, you couldn't be more wrong.