2 ms·
Compared to a tokamak, the stellarator bring engineering efficiency while matching performance. Though ideas for the tokamak and the stellarator may have emerge
by waterheater 3y ago
Compared to a tokamak, the stellarator bring engineering efficiency while matching performance. Though ideas for the tokamak and the stellarator may have emerged together, the main reason tokamaks were built first is because they COULD be built. Without computer-assisted magnet design, stellarators simply couldn't be properly built; the magnetic geometries are just too complex.
In the long run, it's not known stellarators will be the eventual winner in the long race for a viable fusion reactor. The attributes in a winner will be net-positive operational efficiency and superior energy harvesting abilities. Perhaps multiple approaches will be viable.
- tw061023 3y agoI understand the theory. I just hope I will live long enough to see a winner in this race. To be honest, I've been interested in the domain for quite a time and I still want to build a fusor or a polywell at some point just to see it glow. Probably won't happen though.
- waterheater 3y agoThe most difficult parts to obtain will be the power supply and vacuum chamber. Still, there's nothing like garage fusion!