2 ms·
It's not irony, most of the cases NY started were pretty unreasonable and more than a stretch, and have not gone very far, while the current stuff took this lon
by mrguyorama 3y ago
It's not irony, most of the cases NY started were pretty unreasonable and more than a stretch, and have not gone very far, while the current stuff took this long for all the legal machines to get through, because it's really obnoxious to read through mountains of boxes of classified documents to figure out how bad it is, and attempting to claw back some partially destroyed evidence and flip important witnesses.
This is how long a trial of an important person takes.
Everything you've said has been less accurate than the headlines you've cribbed them from.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> It's not irony, most of the cases NY started were pretty unreasonable and more than a stretch, and have not gone very far You mean, like, the guilty on all counts result in the Trump Org tax fraud case or the abuse of charity funds for personal political interests case against Donald Trump, his children, and the Trunp Foundation that ended with millions in liability, various bans, and the disbanding of the Trump Foundation? Or something else that was a stretch that didn't go far?
- mrguyorama 3y agoWell yes, there were successes, but a financial liability has not proven to be something that actually concerns Trump or his cabal, explicitly because his supporters seem to see zero problem with paying for it. Those findings are only justice for the minor crimes they committed, not the stuff that actually matters. Tax fraud and charity fraud are bad things to do, but not exactly the slam dunk that "Going to prison for attempting to overthrow the government of the USA" would be.