3 ms·
I can't disagree with the results, SPs can change your life. HOWEVER, they require significant discipline and regular audits. All the code for them needs to be
by giantrobot 3y ago
I can't disagree with the results, SPs can change your life. HOWEVER, they require significant discipline and regular audits. All the code for them needs to be in source control with a Process for deployment to the DB. You also need a test suite as part of the Process which runs against a staging server with a comparable configuration to prod. The SPs need to be regularly dumped and compared against what's in source control and marked as what's supposed to be released in prod.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- javajosh 3y agoTrue enough; the binding tool handled this. The system of record was in the app server. The db was considered slaved to the app, and more-or-less tightly coupled to it (within reason). This provides a really solid mental model. Side-note: the GP comment was actually doing pretty well (like +7) now it's (+2) so a cadre of anti-stored proc folks did a drive by down-voting. A bit sad, IMO.