> OSS != FOSS While this statement is technically true, I don't think it has any relevance to the topic at hand. While there are some relatively obscure licens

> OSS != FOSS While this statement is technically true, I don't think it has any relevance to the topic at hand. While there are some relatively obscure licenses that are OSS but not FOSS (e.g., the Sybase Open Watcom Public License), isn't everything under discussion here either both free and open source, or neither free nor open source? In particular, the "core" of Open Core is both, but the extras are neither.