3 ms·
Curious why you think it's the wrong way to do it?
by vmatsiiako 3y ago
Curious why you think it's the wrong way to do it?
- josephcsible 3y agoBecause then you're making and monetizing a proprietary product rather than actually monetizing FOSS.
- vmatsiiako 3y agoI'm not sure if I understand your point. OSS != FOSS https://opencoreventures.com/blog/2023-07-open-core-is-misunderstood-business-model/ https://opencoreventures.com/blog/2023-07-open-core-is-misun...
- josephcsible 3y ago> OSS != FOSS While this statement is technically true, I don't think it has any relevance to the topic at hand. While there are some relatively obscure licenses that are OSS but not FOSS (e.g., the Sybase Open Watcom Public License), isn't everything under discussion here either both free and open source, or neither free nor open source? In particular, the "core" of Open Core is both, but the extras are neither.