4 ms·

I remember trying Infiscal, and I was excited to see how good it is, the feature list in the OSS version, and its ease of use... What cooled me off is this limi

by mirzap 3y ago

I remember trying Infiscal, and I was excited to see how good it is, the feature list in the OSS version, and its ease of use... What cooled me off is this limitation in OSS: "3 Infisical Projects, 3 Environments & 5 Team Members." That's not nice. It's OK to limit SSO access to OSS and stuff like that. But limiting essential features - team members is a no-go.

vmatsiiako 3y ago
This is very strange. There is no such limitation. You can create as many projects and environments as you need. You can also add an unlimited number of users
- dangtony98 3y ago
  Second this, we don’t have any such limitations on OSS that is you can totally self-host Infisical on your own infrastructure and have unlimited users, projects, and environments. I think there may be a mix-up here with Infisical Cloud which is the managed service with subscription tiers.
  - mirzap 3y ago
    OK, that's great to hear. You may consider removing the "Usage & Billing" page from OSS when self-hosting. Because I thought I'd have to upgrade OSS with a business license once I reached the limit.
    - vmatsiiako 3y ago
      Yeah, we should probably do that. I get that it might be confusing
- mirzap 3y ago
  Check the pricing page: https://infisical.com/pricing https://infisical.com/pricing Yeah, I've noticed that the app is not enforcing that limit ATM, but the limit was clearly visible in the dashboard when I tried it a couple of months ago (OSS, docker)
  - jgillich 3y ago
    That's only for the hosted service, no? They have a MIT licensed version
    - dangtony98 3y ago
      Yeah the pricing on their is only for the hosted service.
    - mirzap 3y ago
      Yes, but you can see the Usage & Billing page even on OSS. So, it's a bit confusing seeing "Upgrade" CTAs there.
brunoqc 3y ago
> It's OK to limit SSO access to OSS and stuff like that. Personally, I can't wrap my head around people wanting to use Infiscal for better security while *not* using SSO.

by mirzap 3y ago

vmatsiiako 3y ago

This is very strange. There is no such limitation. You can create as many projects and environments as you need. You can also add an unlimited number of users

dangtony98 3y ago
Second this, we don’t have any such limitations on OSS that is you can totally self-host Infisical on your own infrastructure and have unlimited users, projects, and environments. I think there may be a mix-up here with Infisical Cloud which is the managed service with subscription tiers.
- mirzap 3y ago
  OK, that's great to hear. You may consider removing the "Usage & Billing" page from OSS when self-hosting. Because I thought I'd have to upgrade OSS with a business license once I reached the limit.
  - vmatsiiako 3y ago
    Yeah, we should probably do that. I get that it might be confusing
mirzap 3y ago
Check the pricing page: https://infisical.com/pricing https://infisical.com/pricing Yeah, I've noticed that the app is not enforcing that limit ATM, but the limit was clearly visible in the dashboard when I tried it a couple of months ago (OSS, docker)
- jgillich 3y ago
  That's only for the hosted service, no? They have a MIT licensed version
  - dangtony98 3y ago
    Yeah the pricing on their is only for the hosted service.
  - mirzap 3y ago
    Yes, but you can see the Usage & Billing page even on OSS. So, it's a bit confusing seeing "Upgrade" CTAs there.

brunoqc 3y ago

> It's OK to limit SSO access to OSS and stuff like that. Personally, I can't wrap my head around people wanting to use Infiscal for better security while *not* using SSO.