3 ms·
Nobody said it's a binary. The claim is that they've reduced development spending, which is factual. They laid off a ton of developers, are you forgetting tha
by mcpackieh 3y ago
Nobody said it's a binary. The claim is that they've reduced development spending, which is factual. They laid off a ton of developers, are you forgetting that? Or do you think that doesn't count as reduced development spending?
- afavour 3y ago> The claim is that they’ve reduced development spending The claim was more specific than that: it was “reducing software development spending to focus on agenda pushing instead”. Two factual statements: 1) the Mozilla Corporation laid off engineers 2) the Mozilla Foundation spent money pursuing “agendas” I am suggesting that those two events are not necessarily connected to each other.