> I wonder what we consider harmless today that will be taboo in two decades. You're that implying exposing children to porn is considered harmless today. Cons

> I wonder what we consider harmless today that will be taboo in two decades. You're that implying exposing children to porn is considered harmless today. Considered harmless by whom exactly? This isn't about being taboo, this is about parents that don't want to be responsible and let their kids watch porn, it's already illegal to expose children to that. But nobody wants to take responsibility, not the ISP, not the parents, not the online porn companies themselves, nobody. So in an environment where something illegal is perpretrated, if nobody wants to take responsibility then it's up to the legislator to FORCE someone to take responsibility. It turns out it's the digital pimps this time...