3 ms·
While I agree that it's legally murky in some respects, that seems like an opportunity (and a benefit to the writer of the OSS code) for a dialog between the ma
by spaceribs 3y ago
While I agree that it's legally murky in some respects, that seems like an opportunity (and a benefit to the writer of the OSS code) for a dialog between the maintainer and the user of AGPL code to ensure compliance.
Why would you want to open a bunch of loopholes for very specific and complex cases?
- _cenw 3y agoEUPL compatibility is not exactly "opening a bunch of loopholes". It's yielding to a very specific list of licenses, to very specific conditions that exclusively make the resulting license more strict (e.g. combining with AGPL basically turns it into an AGPL licensed work)
- spaceribs 3y agoAh, I'll admit I know a lot less about the EUPL, I'll do some further reading on the subject.