2 ms·
A million different things would have helped in this particular situation. A stall warning that doesn't suddenly cut out when the plane exceeds a particular ang
by vkou 3y ago
A million different things would have helped in this particular situation. A stall warning that doesn't suddenly cut out when the plane exceeds a particular angle of attack [1] (That's an automation failure!). Emergency pilot tubes (That prevents the plane from dropping out of normal law!). Better pilot tubes (That prevents the plane from dropping out of normal law!) A pilot that actually received proper training (That's a human failure!). Not averaging control inputs between the pilot and the copilot (That's a design failure!).
I don't think the takeaway from this is 'In an emergency situation, where the plane knows that it can't make good decisions, it should lock the pilots out and try to fly itself.' By definition, if the plane knew how to fly itself, it wouldn't be an emergency situation!
----
[1] If the plane is so confused that it can't even detect that its in a stall[2], I can't trust it to fly itself.
[2] The stall alarm would turn off when the plane was stalling, and would turn on when it was recovering from a stall!
- bombcar 3y agoYeah, any crash has any number of things that would have prevented it, and Airbus has had issues with the computer knowing better before (the famous airshow crash, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_296Q https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_296Q - the pilot wasn't allowed to stall the plane and it crashed; however if he HAD been allowed to stall the plane it probably would have crashed in a slightly different way).