> That's the Free Software slogan, not open source. The only relationship between the two is that open source can easily be relicensed into Free Software (or pr

> That's the Free Software slogan, not open source. The only relationship between the two is that open source can easily be relicensed into Free Software (or proprietary, or whatever.) While you are correct that the Free Software Movement has slogans like "free as in freedom" and has a definition based on "the four freedoms," the Open Source Movement also recognizes and advocates for "Software Freedom" as well. "We build a world where the freedoms and opportunities of Open Source software can be enjoyed by all." [1] Software that is licensed under Apache 2.0, MIT, BSD, or any of the other so-called "permissive" licenses is labeled "Free Software" by the Free Software Movement as-is. It does not require a "relicense" to become Free Software. Said another way: you don't have to use a copyleft license like the GPL to qualify for the "Free Software" label. It is just a different name for the same thing, because there was a group that developed a vocabulary before another group existed. [1] https://opensource.org/ https://opensource.org/