No I understand. SF is huge. I dont know what is the level (or quality) of home ownership for folks on that median salary. Or even the location and how "i

No I understand. SF is huge. I dont know what is the level (or quality) of home ownership for folks on that median salary. Or even the location and how "indentured" they are. I do agree that as techies we have the luxury of upward mobility which most of the median salary folks may not have the good fortune of. Just that 250k while sounds great on paper - when your crappy home to house a family (at say southbay) is 2M+ (and this is very very low end) being 3x median while something is not quite eye popping. Yes you could always chose to live a 2hour drive away in a more constrained place - but at this point your "eye popping" TC is not looking that great anymore is it? Now should a question be what is a "fair" standard of living everyone should have?