2 ms·
> Randomness? You were talking about «central authority for determining correctness». I replied that no authority does not mean that there is no "more or less
by mdp2021 3y ago
> Randomness?
You were talking about «central authority for determining correctness». I replied that no authority does not mean that there is no "more or less wrong or right".
> Google calls their Bard LLM an AI
It is a .com :) , what did you expect?
- criddell 3y ago> I replied that no authority does not mean that there is no "more or less wrong or right". I never said there isn't right or wrong, only that what is correct is determined by broad usage. > It is a .com :) , what did you expect? Actually, it's a .google https://ai.google/discover/generativeai https://ai.google/discover/generativeai
- mdp2021 3y ago> I never said there isn't right or wrong, only that what is correct is determined by broad usage Others - like us - call "correct" what seems to be "more right". In the context, I proposed that calling LLMs AI has improper sides - substantially, irregardless of the number of people who would adhere to that use, and which I suspect do so mostly out of inattention. > Actually, it's a .google Yes, but substantially, what I meant is that of course a commercial entity («.com») is using a language that lures glamorously, "sales oriented", before precision.